Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Into You Like a Train
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Black Kite (talk) 23:44, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Into You Like a Train (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Same problems as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Let the Angels Commit:"Tagged as failing WP:GNG. Does not seem notable outside of being an episode of Grey's Anatomy." Curb Chain (talk) 00:50, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No indication of wp:notability of/for a separate episode like this. Zero references. Looks like part of mass-production of articles on individual episodes with some material duplicated across articles. North8000 (talk) 04:06, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I don't think the plot summary is very good--this is one of the high points of absurdity of the series,andalthough the summary can't say that without a quotation, the writing should make it plainer. But it's a start, for the framework is usable. Otherwise, it's pretty clear what I think by now. DGG ( talk ) 05:47, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 12:41, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: Numerous Grey's Anatomy episodes have been serially nominated. More general discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/If Tomorrow Never Comes (Grey's Anatomy).--Milowent • hasspoken 13:55, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep
or redirect to season article. With all the serial noms, I do not have time to check each one for notability. But even any that are not notable should be redirected to the season article per WP:TVEP. Rlendog (talk) 21:07, 17 February 2012 (UTC)Per Emmy nomination. Also some additional coverage here [1]. Rlendog (talk) 02:40, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] - Keep—This one resulted in an Emmy nod for the writer, so this particular episode is notable. Trim the plot summary and focus on the encyclopedic parts. Livit⇑Eh?/What? 01:21, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.