Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mokenge P. Malafa
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Per Wikipedia:Speedy_keep #1 - Non deletion request. As suggested, perhaps this discussion is better suited for WP:N/N or even the talk page of the article. (non-admin closure) Dusti*Let's talk!* 03:46, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator followup: this discussion was closed as above, but then that was reverted by another user on the grounds that a non-admin closure was not warranted here. However, a new discussion has already been initiated at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mokenge P. Malafa (2nd nomination) by the same editor who started this one — and since there is no need to maintain two simultaneous discussions I am acting as an administrator to close this one again. Bearcat (talk) 22:22, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Mokenge P. Malafa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Can we check whether this meets WP:PROF please? Barney the barney barney (talk) 20:52, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 21:10, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 21:10, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- To nominator. Instead of asking other people to do the work would you like to do some yourself? For example would you like to tell us what you found on Google scholar etc.? Xxanthippe (talk) 23:36, 16 August 2013 (UTC).[reply]
- Looking at the article, I can see where the nom is coming from, but perhaps this should be moved to WP:N/N for a discussion there first? Stalwart111 00:31, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:44, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.